Sunday, February 28, 2010

That other thing.


Buzz summary:
Okay, in a little over two weeks I've made 62 posts to Buzz. That's over a quarter of my entire blog posting (208) over 2.5 years. So... what the hell is all that? Well, predictably, it's what would normally be sinking into the bog that is my bookmark file. Maybe a fraction could have made it into the blog in a good week, maybe none of it.
Now, instead, I can post just up to (and slightly beyond) the limit before it starts to feel like it's just torturing my contact list. If I didn't feel self conscious about it, I could see easily doubling the rate. This is dangerously easy, fun, and rewarding.
Now part of that inflation is that, in micro-blogging, I'm freed from a lot of constraints that I've worked in over the years that keep me from posting more regularly. Over time, it became so that I didn't really feel comfortable posting here without having a "strong" piece of text, at least a half dozen great found or original images, and one to five videos. And it's very easy for mediocre text to torpedo a post from ever appearing. It may not seem like it, based on word count, but I often hate my own writing. "God, I sound like a complete jerk," I think, after a majority of paragraphs or essays get canned.
What Buzz enables me to do is to post anything that comes along. A link, a video, an image, an animated gif (finally!), a quick snippet of text. I can dash a Buzz post off in 1-5 minutes. At most, 20. A typical, fully featured blog post takes 3-4 hours.

All the tech journalists and boring bloggers are trying to pin down exactly which services Buzz mirrors, and whether it does so more or less favorably. I tried to give a fuck about this. I really did. I made notes, even. But when DJOE & I attempted to discuss it, it just didn't feel that interesting. What it looks like, structurally... it's hard to see how it matters. It's all in how people work in it. Right now, in its complete infancy, while most people seem to be either completely ignoring it or just warily prodding at it, I found a tool that does exactly what I was craving to do. Something really fun that I'd kept myself from doing here; turning something into a complete, chaotic, carnivalesque toxic waste dump. Utterly ridiculous, almost profane (that's still reserved for here), and totally stupid.

As a diligent little McLuhanite disciple I should care much more about its form and characteristics. Maybe it's just how quiet it currently seems, and how isolated you can feel from inside.

The analogy that's formed in my head is that the blog is a remote mountain cabin. You can get there, but it's a pain, and it's mostly not worth it, unless you've made the trip a few times and have come to like the place.

Buzz is like setting up a card table on the sidewalk on an Avenue and just shuffling, pattering, bullshitting. Currently, though, no one's got a phone, and you can't step very far from your table. You have no idea who's at the table down the Avenue.


I've been wanting to write some grand Buzz summarization, but I don't think it will ever happen. I'm too wrapped up and sucked in to be objective or analytic. A content list is nearly impossible. (If I were to try, I'd say the best Youtube videos I've ever seen or reposted, the best low-res and ridiculous internet art I've found, a ton of interesting articles, essays, and audio links, a dash of highbrow on a mountain of near total stupefaction, low-pressure book & film discussion, and whatever else seems remotely possible or tolerable.)

The TLDR version: it's worth it to sign up for a Gmail account if for no other reason than to participate rather than observe. You can even be partially present, and feed the services you're already utilizing into it (like Reader, Twitter, status updates, blogging, Flickr) although I think your content won't be as good as natively produced content, which is maybe partly by design, and partly a by-product of the existing services (like Twitter) being such useless piles of garbage. Still... there's no reason why someone can't prove me wrong. (Actually, I can think of at least two people that already do.)

Maybe this is Web 3.0. Filtered content, and a gradual shift into a realm where not sharing your constant stream of treasures is almost treasonously selfish.

That sounds pretty great.

The downside, of course, like anything internet related, is that when you get your content filtered, and the quality skyrockets... it's really easy to get dangerously addicted.

Dang.

4 comments:

JW Veldhoen said...

You pretty much summed up why I do the FB, easier and faster, so I can cram it with junk about photography and literature and all the botheration that keeps me from healthy socialization. I kinda keep it as a journal so I can go back to things, with the benefit of sharing with "friends". In the end the cafe would be better. Heard you came around to see "House". Sorry I wasn't there. We should have a drink. Anyway, thanks for yr Buzz tho. Only way I can look at dirty pictures while at work!

joem said...

I'm rapidly enjoying Buzz less and less. Each day that goes by, I wish for it to work differently... I wish I could "star" posts like I can star emails and google reader items, so I can come back to them later or note ones I really like... I wish one's Buzz RSS feed actually embedded the pics and videos as it does when you view it in gmail, so that I could follow folks buzzes in google reader... I wish you could have buzz could just embed the pics and videos larger so I don't have to click on each and every one to see what it is...

Sure, part of this is just my resistance to change. But I think the larger part of this is the fact that Buzz is still a very young product and has a ways to go before it's actually what I consider "good."

As it is right now, there are two types of Buzz posts I see: twitter/facebook-like short bits of text, and blogpost-like mixtures of text, pics, and vids. Personally, I can't stand the mixture. I keep harping on the immediacy aspect of Buzz, due to the fact that there is no good way to save/star a post and due to how newly-commented on stuff bubbles to the top, and this is why. With short bits of text, it's easy to read/reply immediately. But as soon as people post something like a blog post, or an article, or a video (or to a lesser extent pics) it breaks that immediacy. (Granted, Facebook's feed (or whatever they call it) has the exact same problems, and that's precisely why I dislike Facebook.)

Then again, this may just be a case of Buzz not being good for me but fine and dandy for everyone else, as I am probably far from the typical Buzz user. As you no doubt know, I consume entire quadrants of internet for breakfast each day. This makes the rest of the internet seem dangerously redundant (or, on the other end of the spectrum, too sparse), hence my desire for everything to have an RSS feed that I can manage in my own way. (How I manage my RSS feeds is a boring article suited for my sparsely updated blog, of course.)

Bah. I don't know. Maybe I'll like it in a year or two, as long as Google makes worthwhile revisions as it has done with Gmail in the past. Then again, a lot of the more recent revisions to Google Reader have similarly rubbed me the wrong way, so who knows... I may be falling out of sync with Google in general. Lord knows my gmail inbox is a scary mess of unread and half-read emails that I avoid as much as possible.... (And therein lies another of my complaints with Buzz! I need to log in to Gmail in order to follow it! And yet I've been trying to avoid logging into Gmail as much as possible! Gah!)

Also, just for the record (and I hope you already know this), I'm not trying to play devil's advocate nor am I merely poo-poo-ing a new hot trend. These are all genuine complaints about Buzz that are truly bothering me. And I love Google with most of my heart, too. (That may be why I care so much: because Buzz is the only Google product that has let me down this much. I demand better!)

joem said...

Sorry for the super long comment, but I felt it important that you understand why I may very soon just stop following Buzz entirely. It's not you... it's nothing personal. It's Buzz. I don't think it's for me.

joem said...

Follow-up!

As you no doubt have noticed, I've come around to Buzz, even posting on it myself from time to time.

I still wish I could either star things in Buzz, or better yet, get the full, uncrippled feed from Buzz into Google Reader. It seems like such an obvious feature that I was (and sort of still am) offended that Google (O Google!) could have left it out...